QLvsJAGUAR wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2025 4:27 pm
It is always great to see people learning to explore the QL world! Also great to see the help/support of QL dinosaurs answering the same or similar questions of newbies or the inexperienced. But why do people often go to the trouble of building their own kind of QL runtime environment to do their intended "job", when there are ready-to-use software distributions available? Like QL/E, in which went hundreds of hours work of very experienced QLers. Once the basics of QL are understood by using QL/E or other distributions and reading the enclosed documentation, anyone is free to configure/adapt/change/improve the environment or even ask for a change request. I mean, no one would try to build their own Windows, Mac OS or Linux system from scratch when there are installation routines available from Microsoft, Apple or the various Linux distributions.
Hi,
It is always nice to see how people helps newbies like me.
About the other points... well... I understand your POV, but perhaps if you wear a newbie shoes would be easier to understand. I mean...
The most of you have growth up with the QL and lived a lot of stages. So what you consider natural and easy is not for others. Because we have not your background. That is the most important point to understand why many decide to take apart their QLs or do not continue creating for QL systems.
The jump is too high, not because difficulties (that could too) but the lack of information in the middle way. The information is somewhere, mixed up with a lot of variants. But it is very often same than no information.
You know the tools, where they are how to use them, but pay attention: I have explained a context, also described what I have and my point to start and you kindly gave me (next post) some steps to follow. You have thought they are easy to do, but far from reality I cannot. Because there are lack of information that you supposed I have (or tools).
Your mistake? noway, my mistake? noway. So? we are in different places about acknowledge.
That is the main problem why not so many dear to introduce themselves into QL World (IMO). At least is what the most people that I suggested to travel by QL world and learn about it together tell me very often.
Perhaps we are too much get use to IDEs that automatize everything and we just code and design the APPs, so the time requirements even for programmers or engineers to start coding or creating for QL could be not short but also discouraging.
Now, what I love is all the people (like you) that are trying to help me.
Also I enjoy very much that even a repeated subject is attended and creating new comments, discussions and so on... because a forum without it, is... a site without live. Isn't it?
Of course, matter of preferences. But I prefer to ask you the basis, and request for help than take everything out and spend time in other systems with more available information and docs to start.
About Windows, Linux, OS/2... whatever. There are people doing exactly what you have said they are not doing. In many levels. And that is great. Some gets forgotten, other become very useful (Ubuntu, Mint, Mandriva, RedHat, FreeDos, OS/2 Lion, Minerva, ... ). don't they?
Let's go to the next message to reply

Sorry for being late answering, crazy days
